By Daniel Pipes, National Post
This month, Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak declared that Israel must withdraw from Palestinian territories. “The world isn’t willing to accept — and we won’t change that in 2010 — the expectation that Israel will rule another people for decades more,” he said. “It’s something that doesn’t exist anywhere else in the world.”
Is he right? Is peace even possible? And if so, what form should a final agreement take? Those are the questions we asked National Post writers in our series “What’s Your Peace Plan?”
My peace plan is simple: Israel defeats its enemies.
Victory uniquely creates circumstances conducive to peace. Wars end, the historical record confirms, when one side concedes defeat and the other wins. This makes intuitive sense, for so long as both sides aspire to achieve their ambitions, fighting continues or it potentially can resume.
The goal of victory is not exactly something novel. Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese strategist, advised that in war, “Let your great object be victory.” Raimondo Montecuccoli, a seventeenth-century Austrian, said that “The objective in war is victory.” Carl von Clausewitz, a nineteenth-century Prussian, added that “War is an act of violence to compel the enemy to fulfill our will.” Winston Churchill told the British people: “You ask: what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory – victory – at all costs, victory, in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be.” Dwight D. Eisenhower observed that “In war, there is no substitute for victory.” These insights from prior eras still hold, for however much weaponry changes, human nature remains the same.
Victory means imposing one’s will on the enemy, compelling him to abandon his war goals. Germans, forced to surrender in World War I, retained the goal of dominating Europe and a few years later looked to Hitler to achieve this goal. Signed pieces of paper matter only if one side has cried “Uncle”: The Vietnam War ostensibly concluded through diplomacy in 1973 but both sides continued to seek their war aims until the North won ultimate victory in 1975.
Willpower is the key: shooting down planes, destroying tanks, exhausting munitions, making soldiers flee, and seizing land are not decisive in themselves but must be accompanied by a psychological collapse. North Korea’s loss in 1953, Saddam Hussein’s in 1991, and the Iraqi Sunni loss in 2003 did not translate into despair. Conversely, the French gave up in Algeria in 1962, despite out-manning and out-gunning their foes, as did the Americans in Vietnam in 1975 and the Soviets in Afghanistan in 1989. The Cold War ended without a fatality. In all these cases, the losers maintained large arsenals, armies, and functioning economies. But they ran out of will.
Likewise, the Arab-Israeli conflict will be resolved only when one side gives up.
Until now, through round after round of war, both sides have retained their goals. Israel fights to win acceptance by its enemies, while those enemies fight to eliminate Israel. Those goals are raw, unchanging, and mutually contradictory. Israel’s acceptance or elimination are the only states of peace. Each observer must opt for one solution or the other. A civilized person will want Israel to win, for its goal is defensive, to protect an existing and flourishing country. Its enemies’ goal of destruction amounts to pure barbarism.
For nearly 60 years, Arab rejectionists, now joined by Iranian and leftist counterparts, have tried to eliminate Israel through multiple strategies: they work to undermine its legitimacy intellectually, overwhelm it demographically, isolate it economically, restrain its defenses diplomatically, fight it conventionally, demoralize it with terror, and threaten to destroy it with WMDs. While the enemies of Israel have pursued their goals with energy and will, they have met few successes.
Ironically, Israelis over time responded to the incessant assault on their country by losing sight of the need to win. The right developed schemes to finesse victory, the center experimented with appeasement and unilateralism, and the left wallowed in guilt and self-recrimination. Exceedingly few Israelis understand the unfinished business of victory, of crushing the enemy’s will and getting him to accept the permanence of the Jewish state.
Fortunately for Israel, it need only defeat the Palestinians, and not the entire Arab or Muslim population, which eventually will follow the Palestinian lead in accepting Israel. Fortunately too, although the Palestinians have built an awesome reputation for endurance, they can be beaten. If the Germans and Japanese could be forced to give up in 1945 and the Americans in 1975, how can Palestinians be exempt from defeat?
Of course, Israel faces obstacles in achieving victory. The country is hemmed in generally by international expectations (from the United Nations Security Council, for example) and specifically by the policies of its main ally, the U.S. government. Therefore, if Jerusalem is to win, that starts with a change in policy in the United States and in other Western countries. Those governments should urge Israel to seek victory by convincing the Palestinians that they have lost.
This means undoing the perceptions of Israel’s weakness that grew during the Oslo process (1993-2000) and then the twin withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza (2000-05). Jerusalem appeared back on track during Ariel Sharon’s first three years as prime minister, 2001-03 and his tough stance then marked real progress in Israel’s war effort. Only when it became clear in late 2004 that Sharon really did plan to withdraw unilaterally from Gaza did the Palestinian mood revive and Israel stopped winning. Ehud Olmert’s debilitating prime ministry has been only partially remedied by Binyamin Netanyahu over the past year.
Ironically, an Israeli victory would bring yet greater benefits to the Palestinians than to Israel. Israelis would benefit by being rid of an atavistic war, to be sure, but their country is a functioning, modern society. For Palestinians, in contrast, abandoning the fetid irredentist dream of eliminating their neighbor would finally offer them a chance to tend their own misbegotten garden, to develop their deeply deficient polity, economy, society, and culture.
Thus does my peace plan both end the war and bring unique benefits to all directly involved.
Mr. Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.
No victory is possible in this conflict. It is spiritual warfare. The closest man can come through his own initiative is to create a stillness and call it a peace. That means either Jew or Muslim must die. Peace peace…there is no peace and there shall be no peace. No other option exists.
In this week’s program, Hal Lindsey was talking about the conditions leading up to Russia’s invasion of Israel, Ezekiel 38 – 39. They come to take spoil. The surrounding nations aren’t mentioned. Things will have to change in the intervening time. They won’t leave peacefully. I’ll leave it to the reader to speculate how that can happen.
The land belongs to Israel, the Lord said so!!!
Ehud Barak and his friend Netanyahu must go, please take with him Peres and other leftist who are undermining Israelis, they people they are supposed to lead and protect. I have seen some dumb people in my time but the leaders of Israel are the dumbest. The send their sons and daughters to fight their enemy and when they win the leaders return the land to the enemy. Throw the bums out!
Hava Dishon
Any Israel leader that does not tell bbho imposter POTUS to take a hike and kick out all quasi-palestinians (Israel sovereignity is #1 priority) is too weak to win the war that is quickly coming to Israel and Arabs.
In the above article it was mentioned the name of Sun Tzu, a great military strategist. However, I wonder if Mr. Barak and his military strategists have taken into consideration to use the instructions of the writings “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu. The Vietnamese used the and they won, as well as other countries which were not in a position as strong militarily as Israel does. From my observations of how the Palestinians have been taking their fight against Israel, it seems they are the ones who read the book, since they are winning the “popularity” war in the UN. Please, pay attention to the teachings of Sun Tzu and have faith in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to give you victory, which is the only thing worth fighting for. Remember: “Live to fight another day” and “Know each of your enemy’s moves” ; before making your move.
I brought my family to Spain 11 years ago from South Africa when I got tired of the crime and violence, and tired of every ANC member telling us whites we were “too Euro-centric”. Well, we like living in a civilized place and we came back to our roots in Europe.
The Arabs occupying parts of Israel should go back to Arabia, Syria, Egypt and JORDAN which is 78% of Israel’s land taken from them by Britain and the UN. There they can practise their satanic religion of hatred and killing on each other and leave innocent Jewish people alone.
Israel is God’s land, on long-lease to the Jews and
NOBODY ELSE.
Good article, Mr Pipes.