By: WALID SHOEBAT, Shoebat—
Yesterday, on Memorial Day we open the papers to read the headlines Turkey and US ‘agree in principle’ to provide air support for Syrian rebels. And it wasn’t the president of the United States or a spokesperson from the White house that broke the news, but through the mouth of the Turks, Mevlut Cavusoglu, the Turkish foreign minister told the pro-government Daily Sabah newspaper in comments published Monday on Memorial Day.
On Memorial Day, the Turks told us that the “U.S. have agreed in “principle” to provide air protection to Syrian rebels being trained and equipped to supposedly fight ISIS, once they enter Syrian territory for battle, Turkey’s foreign minister said.
The two countries (U.S. and Turkey) agreed in February to train and equip up to 15,000 Syrian Jihadists at a cost of half a billion U.S. dollars paid by the U.S., of course, as a U.S. program designed to add a credible ground force to an air bombing campaign supposedly against ISIS. But don’t be fooled, read the trick between the lines from Cavusoglu’s mouth:
Both ISIS and the regime forces continue their assaults and killings. … with this program, we are trying to achieve a balance. The opposition forces are fighting on both fronts; while the fight against ISIS is prioritized, the regime must be also stopped.
“The regime must be stopped”. The war is not on ISIS, but committing our troops in Syria to end the government of Bashar Al-Assad.
Any journalist worth his salt can ask the White House press secretary Josh Earnest: Sir, how is it that we claim to fight a war on terror in Syria, while Saudi Arabia, The Gulf States, Turkey and now even the U.S. Military are now sent to support terrorists: al-Qaeda’s affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra (a recognized terrorist organization) and Jaish al-Fatah (Army of Conquest) which was previously Ahrar ash-Sham, renaming itself on March 24 2015?
Both are terrorists Islamic Caliphate minded and both operate just like ISIS, with all the blood and gore. The largest group in the Army of Conquest, which includes a coalition of Muslim Brotherhood of Syria linked battalions. Vice News tries to document for western consumption what any seasoned analyst can see, the anti-Bashar forces are Jihadi terrorists:
The war then is on Syria, in support of these Islamic Caliphate rebels. By using simple logic, we can conclude that with Islam’s Bay’at (allegiance) that such factions, after ousting Bashar, and just as these terrorist groups change names, they will eventually consolidate even ISIS defectors who will be glad to give their allegiance to a new name so that Syria becomes an Islamist puppet of Turkey while the U.S. commits even more money to fix all the rubble in Syria as they did in Iraq. Your tax dollar at work for Allah.
By this our U.S. troops are committed, not to fight a war for freedom, but to aid and abet pure evil.
So much for Memorial Day.
One year ago we wrote regarding Syria The Coming Iranian-Turkish Alliance And Why Syria Is TOAST. In it we did not only explain the big-picture of an Iranian-Turkish alliance to divide the Middle East, which is yet to come, but we predicted Bashar’s fall and that the void in Iraq, will become an Iranian-backed Shiite regime. This is exactly what we see today, forty different Iranian brigades are now camped in Iraq. We also predicted that the noose will tighten on Syria through military pressure from the U.S. and Turkey. This is exactly the situation now. We also predicted that Syria will eventually fall in the hands of Turkey:
“Turkey, today has become the owner of the global war and is backed politically by NATO. To Tehran Turkey is an essential partner in the Islamic awakening and it does not want a clash with it, even if it costs it secular Syria. Any Iranian interference will complicate the situation and brings strong reaction from the Sunni Muslims and Arab nationalists. The so-called “Iran experts” and “Turkey experts” and all the U.S. government officials with its propaganda machine says that Iran is growing increasingly unstable and that Erdogan was on his way out, were all wrong. They see things from an economic prism that is void of the ideological dynamo, which is truly the mover and shaker in the region. Iran and Turkey’s influence can be felt throughout the Muslim world. The lesson America cannot get a grip on regarding the Middle East, is that you can’t have voids and yes, its all about religion, stupid. The destruction of Iraq’s regime was not only satisfying to Iran but it also opened the door to a dramatic shift in Iran’s geopolitical influence. Iraq now has a Shiite regime. The Iranians anticipated the American move and played its chess piece by creating pro-Iranian elements using the Iraqi Shiites and with the United States engaged in a war against Sunni insurgents, the Shia, already a majority, moved to fill the void. Not only did the United States loose its bishops, but they also added a major check by Iran to its Middle East queen: Saudi Arabia. Tehran now has a check on Mecca and Bashar al-Assad’s desperate need of Iranian support simply strengthened Tehran’s hand. Now that Tehran made a deal to keep its nuclear program (as we predicted), it gave the Iranians a powerful bargaining chip and diverted U.S. and Israeli attention from the growing Iranian sphere of influence. Now the U.S. is attempting to move a few pawns to save the situation by threatening Syria but is confused to see the real results. We were correct all along: The U.S. war on Syria was not to bring freedom to the Syrian people but was to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government in order to target Iran. While the U.S. could get Syria, the geo-political repercussions will not be felt until way later when Turkey rules Syria instead of Iran.”
So many were the articles we wrote on how Syria plays the major role in the unfolding Islamic plan from both Muslim eschatological view to Ottoman dream.
The American simpleton, the sweet cinnamon scented Apple Pie, needs to stop being an ignoramus, read and learn. Years ago, hints by Apple Pies on questioning Obama’s loyalty to the U.S. was considered conspiracy theory. Today Americans are becoming increasingly more suspicious struggling to find rhyme or reason for Obama’s policies to turn the Middle East into Shish-Kabbob.
Rudy Giuliani, a New York Bagel and a true Apple Pie, seems to attribute Obama’s policies to be influenced through his affiliations with radical socialists like Frank Marshall Davis. But serious questions will prove that Obama’s policies mimics Erdogan’s, especially when it comes to the two most powerful secular Arab states, Syria and Egypt?
Such policies do not stem from a Marxist mindset or even an American apple pie. To go against secular governments like Egypt and Syria is something ingrained in Muslim Brotherhood psyche and is why the U.S. refuses to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood as “terrorist organization” proving the myth of U.S. War On Terror.
The history to be repeated eschatologically is the pride of Erdogan when the Ottoman Sultan Selim I turned against Syria and Egypt, conquered them and ruled the Middle East.
And why is Obama, like Erdogan, aiding only so-called Syrian rebels when in fact they are Al-Nusra terrorists including what was called Ansar Al-Sham Muslim Brotherhood affiliates. All this while both policies of Turkey and the U.S. exclude training Christians and Kurds?
The U.S. banks on a population that is a-historic and are oblivious to the history of the region. It was at the Battle of Marj Dābiq (Arabic: مرج دابق) as we all learned as children was the most decisive military clash in Middle Eastern history (1516 AD) near the town of Dabiq, 44 km north of Aleppo, Syria between the Ottoman Empire and the Mamluk Sultanate that is the key for the Turks.
The mention of Dabiq to ISIS and Turkey reveals more than just history, but also eschatology of invading Egypt for a grand future victory for Erdogan’s ultimate dream to revive the sick man of Europe. Dabiq is reverting back the clock to when Sultan Selim I (King of the North) of the Ottomans had just pushed back and vanquished the Safavid Persians (The biblical Bear) at the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514—and turned their full might against the Mamluks, who ruled in Syria and Egypt (The biblical kingdom of the south) to complete the Ottoman conquest of the Middle East and mark their Ottoman supremacy in history.
Can anyone deny that Erdogan and Obama are setting policies in their nations that is preparing all this by reversing Sykes Picot in supporting the Arab Spring which is crippling nationalism and advancing the caliphate agenda?
No Middle East analyst today can deny that the United States through Obama was the key player which advanced the demolision of nationalism and advanced a caliphate agenda throughout the entire Middle East.
And can anyone deny that both Erdogan and Obama when speaking on Islam their words never go against the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda? One might object that Obama denounces ISIS, but so does the Muslim Brotherhood and so does Turkey. In fact, even ISIS makes fun of Obama as just another Saudi style theologian.
It is these two, Syria and Egypt, that are necessary keys to complete the mission of an Ottoman conquest of the Middle East as to repeat the glory days of Selim I.
Everything in both of Obama’s and Erdogan’s policies prove it.
It is for this reason that Obama’s aides declined to back Egypt’s military operation against ISIS and instead Obama continues to work with Erdogan, his true partner, in training the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood of Syria.
Why would the United States throw away one of its closest Arab allies in the Middle East: Egypt?
This should no longer be a mystery which even White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest and State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki could not adequately answer.
Is it now becoming obvious that Obama’s policies will allow a caliphate control over Libya which will turn that entire region of North Africa into the next Somalia recreating even another Barbary Pirates which will move even further to the gates of Vienna to threaten Christendom?
The caption says “The Killing Of The Christians” titled as a war and announced the players “ between the followers of Sharia and the worshippers of the Cross”
There is no way to counter our argument. You might counter that Syria is a proxy of Iran and that Obama wants to prevent Iranian expansion, but if this is true, why then is Obama looking the other way while Iran advances its nuclear program and even sets 40 rebel groups allied to Iran and led solely by Iran in Iraq?
And you might also counter that aiding insurgents is for humanitarian reasons, but have you also considered that both, Erdogan and Obama, support the type of insurgents in Syria that holds the second hub of Muslim Brotherhood ideology after Egypt?
It was Bashar Al-Assad’s father who decimated the Muslim Brotherhood in 1982 Hama Massacre one of the single deadliest acts by any Arab government against the Muslim Brotherhood in the modern Middle East. And can anyone deny that the Muslim Brotherhood revolution in Syria is being backed by the most powerful man on earth, Barack Hussein Obama?
To the American who knows little about the armed Muslim Brotherhood of Syria, he thinks that Bashar is a tyrant for simply wanting to keep his seat of power. Does Obama not know with all the advisors he has, that the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood is believed to control, through funding, one-fourth to one-third of the disparate armed rebel brigades known collectively as the Free Syrian Army (FSA)?And if raising a Free Syrian Army was not an Islamist agenda, in other words, they were mild peppers, can anyone deny that what began with scattered supposedly moderate opposition forces were in reality Muslim Brotherhood operatives, which then became something that was later utilized by the Salafist rebel group Ahrar al Sham which was then utilized by al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra Front, which is now the same as ISIS?And if the military training was utilized for such an evolution, can anyone deny that the fighters, regardless of the extremist heat level on the “chart” would always end up warriors for the Caliphate.Real American apple pie, while he could at times make stupid decisions, the moment he would realize the mistake, he would retract the policy. For example, Joe Biden, even being a democrat, when it comes to Syria said “Our allies in the region were our largest problem in Syria,” Biden stated. “They were so determined to take down Assad,” he added, that in a sense they started a “proxy Sunni-Shia war” by pouring “hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad.”Even though Biden was then forced to issue a retraction and an apology due to political pressure, can anyone deny that his tirade uncovered a truth that most experts and political analysts have expressed as early as 2011?
If Obama was not a Muslim sympathizer, can anyone show Obama sharing more positive views on Christianity and its history in contrast to any critical views on Islam and its violent history?Even simple observations tell us, Obama and Erdogan, both speak Arabic. How did they learn this language that is foreign to their nationality? And what language where they using in these private conversations? English? Erdogan speaks no English. Turkish? Obama speaks no Turkish.Obama-and-ErdoganoeCan anyone tell us what language they are speaking in private? Can anyone tell us if Obama speaks Turkish or if Erdogan speaks English? If so, why when it comes to the discussions intended for public consumption, we always find an interpreter since neither can speak a lick of the other man’s language?
And when it comes to Israel, fact is, there is no rift between Obama and Netanyahu, the friendship was never there from the beginning. Obama is not Apple pie to care about Israel. U.S. officials believe Netanyahu’s trips to Washington were aimed primarily at derailing a nuclear deal with Iran, Obama’s signature foreign policy objective. While Netanyahu has long been skeptical of the negotiations, his opposition has increased over what he sees as Obama’s willingness to make concessions that would leave Iran on the brink of being able to build a nuclear weapon.
Even Saudi Arabia, the Wahhabists who fear Iran, would not approve of Obama’s policies in Iraq. However, both Turkey’s Erdogan and Iran’s Rouhani will, 100%.
As an X-Muslim, the Grand Caliphate was always the hottest discussion while sitting in the halls of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, even later in mosques in the United States where activists from all over the globe discussed plans on how to revive it. Obama is not simply a socialist or a dummy as many claim and a quick look at his direction of U.S. Foreign Policy on Islamic issues will reveal that he is meticulous and careful ensuring it fits Islam’s historical and eschatological agenda.
And if you are still in doubt, I ask: where were you during the sixties and even the eighties when we were in your learning centers discussing how the Muslim Brotherhood will influence every aspect of your system from government to education, all as a plan for a grand caliphate which is to be supported, infused and initiated right from your backyard and from within your governmental system?
Which of the two was stupid: us, or you? Who underestimated who?
My journey to becoming an ‘Apple Pie’ was not an easy road, for many still suspect, I am still Shish-Kabob.
I tell you the truth, Obama is not as naive as you think in administering his policies. Obama in the White House is exactly where the devil wants to plant his man to prevent the most powerful nation on earth from preventing this Caliphate to rise and consume much flesh as it is attempting to do already.
Obama, who speaks fluent Arabic and knows Islam quite well is no different than his friend who resides as the Sultan of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. These two are key in this master plan and whether you believe it or not, history will some day record the facts.